Mozilla, we had a little transparency problem

We put too less attention to  "Community driven development" and "Transparent" part of our core culture recent years.

Why is Focus stay so secret before Mozlando, even we NDA covered Mozillians know nothing about it before it on stage? How can "we" say something like "we will take Firefox OS ..." or "we will go..."  without we even knowing it before the news and before someone on stage make the notice? Why is there more and more secret and non-public future feature of Firefox that we cannot find plan anywhere (eg., that "stream" things), And why could we took down all l10n-ed part of Webmaker (and even change it's name to Mozilla Learning without we had any discussion, and so far we still don't know anything about it's future's l10n strategy?)

we, we, we, we, we. How can Mozilla talk about “we” when “we” don’t even know what’s going on? - Elio 

I'm pretty agree the echo from BobChao's comment to Elio's blog post. We had a serious problem here and we need a little more TRANSPARENT PROCEDURE to fix it, just as our manifesto indicated. "Transparent community-based processes promote participation, accountability and trust." And we does need some more participation now!